The value of endocervical curettage for diagnosis of cervical precancers or worse at colposcopy of women with atypical glandular cells cytology

0
The value of endocervical curettage for diagnosis of cervical precancers or worse at colposcopy of women with atypical glandular cells cytology

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volume 11 – 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1476361

This article is part of the Research Topic Advancements in Diagnostic and Management Strategies for Gynecological Pathologies View all 5 articles

Provisionally accepted

  • 1
    Fujian Provincial Cervical Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Health Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, China
  • 2
    Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: This study evaluates the effectiveness of endocervical curettage (ECC) in identifying additional cervical cancer and its precursors in women with atypical glandular cells (AGC) cytology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records for women referred to colposcopy with AGC cytology between January 2019 and December 2023. The study included 433 women with AGC cytology who underwent both biopsy and ECC. Clinical characteristics such as demographics, clinical history, cytology, HPV status, colposcopic findings, and pathology were analyzed. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were applied to compare the characteristics of ECC-diagnosed cervical precancers or worse (HSIL+) and normal/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL).The overall detection rate of HSIL+ in this population was 19.4% (86/443), with ECC alone identifying HSIL+ in 1.3% (6/443) of cases. However, ECC showed greater utility in certain subgroups. The highest additional HSIL+ detection from ECC was observed in women with HPV 16/18 infection (7.2%) and those with AGC-FN cytology (4.4%). ECC’s additional yield of HSIL+ was higher in those with normal or LSIL colposcopic impressions compared to those with HSIL+ impressions. Conversely, no additional HSIL+ cases were identified by ECC alone in women under 30 years old, those with negative high-risk HPV results, or those with type 1/2 transformation zones.For women with AGC cytology, ECC should be performed in patients with AGC-FN cytology, HPV 16/18 infections, type 3 transformation zones, and normal or low-grade colposcopic impressions. This approach enhances the identification of HSIL+ cases by reducing false negatives. However, for women younger than 30 years old and those with type 1/2 transformation zones, ECC offers limited benefit.

    Keywords:
    cervical curettage, Colposcopy, Biopsy, cervical lesions, atypical glandular cells

    Received:
    05 Aug 2024;
    Accepted:
    25 Nov 2024.

    Copyright:
    © 2024 Chen, Wen, Chen, Xue, Zheng and Pan. This is an
    open-access article distributed under the terms of the
    Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted,
    provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the
    original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted
    academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which
    does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:

    Fanghong Wen, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

    Jiancui Chen, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

    Huifeng Xue, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

    Xiangqin Zheng, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

    Diling Pan, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China

    Disclaimer:
    All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and
    do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or
    those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that
    may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its
    manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *